Applying for a resource consent can be a complex process, and many applicants are unsure how long a decision should take.

Under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), councils are required to process resource consent applications within statutory timeframes. However, there are circumstances where the clock can be paused or extended.

Once a resource consent application is lodged, the council will undertake an initial review to determine whether sufficient information has been provided. If further information is required, the council may issue a Request for Further Information (RFI). When an RFI is issued, the statutory processing clock stops until the requested information is supplied.

In some situations, councils may also extend the statutory timeframe. Extensions of time can occur for a variety of reasons, including the complexity of the application or the need for specialist assessments. Councils are required to notify applicants when an extension is granted and explain the reasons for it.

The statutory processing timeframe varies depending on the type of application. For many non-notified resource consents, the decision must generally be issued within 20 working days, subject to any pauses for RFIs or approved extensions. Notified applications have longer statutory timeframes due to the additional public participation and hearing processes involved.

Because pauses and extensions affect the calculation of processing time, it can be difficult for applicants to determine whether a council has exceeded the statutory timeframe. However, if a decision is issued late, applicants may be entitled to a discount on the fees charged by the council.

The RMA requires councils to provide fee discounts where certain statutory processing timeframes are exceeded. The amount of the discount depends on the extent of the delay and the fees paid.

If you believe your resource consent decision was issued outside the statutory timeframe, we can help assess the processing history, calculate the relevant timeframes, and determine whether you may be entitled to a fee discount.

‍

Was this article helpful?  Here’s some other topics that might be interesting to you:

What Can You Build On Your property in Christchurch? Understanding the District Plan

National Policy Statement for Natural Hazards

‍

Disclaimer

This article contains general information and opinion based on our expertise. It is provided free of charge and does not constitute legal or other professional advice. The information within it was up to date at the time of publishing.

Have you got further questions about this topic or our other services?

We are always happy to help – drop us an email rmplanning@inovo.nz, or phone us on 020 4000 0294.

Environment Canterbury (ECan) publicly notified Plan Change 8 (PC8) on 4 July 2026. If you’re planning a subdivision, infrastructure project, or larger development in Canterbury, this change may affect your project.

In simple terms, PC8 is a proposed update to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan (LWRP). It aims to remove some of the barriers that have made certain projects more difficult in recent years, particularly those involving constructed wetlands, or shallow groundwater.

Submissions on PC8 are now open and close on 4 August 2026, so this is a good time to understand what’s changing and whether it might affect your project.

PC8 is essentially trying to refine the rules so they better reflect how projects are designed, built and operate, while still managing environmental effects.

What does Plan Change 8 propose to change?

There are three key areas where PC8 introduces new or updated rules.

1. More flexibility around water use
   PC8 introduces provisions that allow existing water consents to be used differently in certain situations. This may be relevant where a site already has water allocated, but the way that water is used changes over time.
2. Infrastructure that interacts with groundwater
   This is one of the most significant changes for projects involving new infrastructure, such as roading and servicing systems that require excavation below ground level. In some areas, this means intercepting groundwater.
   Under the current rules, that can trigger complex consent requirements. PC8 introduces a more structured approach by recognising that groundwater may be incidentally intercepted during construction, providing clearer pathways for consenting infrastructure activities. This doesn’t remove all constraints, but it does create a more workable framework for projects that need to deal with shallow groundwater.
3. Easier pathway for constructed wetlands
4. Constructed wetlands are often used for stormwater treatment and detention, and environmental enhancement. Under PC8, there is stronger support for these systems, including a new definition of constructed wetlands and a set of rules that allow them as a permitted activity in some cases.

What does Plan Change 8 mean in practice?

For many projects, these changes come together.

For example, a new subdivision might include stormwater ponds or wetlands that require excavation below the groundwater table. Under PC8, that type of project may be able to rely on updated wetland rules and a clearer pathway for groundwater interception.

Previously takes from over allocated aquifers were considered prohibited even if the take was then discharged back into the groundwater system. The new rules do not automatically make everything permitted, but they do provide a more consenting pathway to allow development in these situations.

These rules have immediate legal effect from the date of public notification (4 July 2026), meaning they can already apply to current projects and consent applications.

Even though the rules are more enabling, PC8 still requires that effects are appropriately managed. For example, groundwater interception needs to be minimised as far as practicable, and construction methods and design still matter. In most cases, technical input from engineers or specialists will still be needed to support the approach.

PC8 sits alongside other planning requirements. Depending on the project, other provisions such as the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater may also apply and need to be considered as part of the overall consenting approach.

So, while PC8 may make things more achievable, it does not remove the need for careful design, engineering input, and a good understanding of the consenting pathway.

Why does this matter to you now?

Given that the PC8 provisions will have immediate legal effect, this is not just something to keep an eye on for the future, it is already something that may need to be considered as part of current projects and consent applications.

At the same time, submissions are open until 4 August 2026, which provides a short window to step back and check how these rules are working in practice before they are finalised.

If you are working on a greenfield project now or in the near future, it is worth taking a moment to consider whether these changes aline up with your plans. Projects that involve excavation below ground level, such as new pump stations, stormwater basins or wetlands, or sites with known groundwater constraints are particularly likely to be affected.

PC8 may not only influence how a project is approached today, and the current submission stage gives you an opportunity to raise any gaps or uncertainties early and have your say. In our experience, this step is often overlooked, and once the rules are finalised, it becomes much harder to revisit how they apply in practice.

How Inovo can help

At Inovo, our team includes planners, engineers, surveyors and project managers who work together to understand how planning rules apply in practice.

That includes reviewing how plan changes like PC8 affect specific projects, identifying risks or opportunities early, and supporting the preparation of submissions where needed.

If you’re unsure how these changes might apply to your project, or whether it’s worth making a submission, feel free to get in touch.

rmplanning@inovo.nz

020 4000 0294  

‍

Was this article helpful?  Here’s some other topics that might be interesting to you:

What Can You Build On Your property in Christchurch? Understanding the District Plan

Updated Granny Flat Flexibility

‍

Disclaimer

This article contains general information and opinion based on our expertise. It is provided free of charge and does not constitute legal or other professional advice. The information within it was up to date at the time of publishing.

Have you got further questions about this topic or our other services?

We are always happy to help – drop us an email rmplanning@inovo.nz, or phone us on 020 4000 0294.

‍

Supporting Auckland's Ferry Future on the Water

Inovo is pleased to be providing Project Management services for the Beach Haven and Hobsonville Wharf Upgrade Project, helping Auckland Transport {tag} prepare its ferry infrastructure for larger capacity ferries and the future introduction of electric vessels.

Hobsonville Point is the fastest growing route on the Auckland ferry network. The project involves the detailed design, supply, and installation of upgraded boarding facilities at both terminals. Works include new boarding platforms and shelters designed to accommodate the higher boarding heights of new vessels, as well as future-proofing the pontoon for future electric charging at Hobsonville Point.

As Project Managers, Inovo has been responsible for:

• Project Management across both sites
• Contract Administration and Engineer's Representative duties under NZS 3916
• Programme, cost and progress reporting
• Quality management through Auckland Transport's design review process
• Stakeholder engagement and coordination across multiple parties

‍

This project is a significant step towards meeting growing passenger demand now, while keeping one eye on the future decarbonisation of Auckland's public transport network.

We're proud to be working alongside Auckland Transport and project partners to deliver infrastructure that supports sustainable public transport outcomes for Auckland communities.